2025/01/22（Wed）18:57
×[PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。
No.｜｜Comment｜Trackback
2007/09/16（Sun）15:35
Surely, to dig a well might be a good support for those in need for the water.
However, nowadays, it is not rare that you find no new wells give you less water than you expected; the underwater is siphoned up already by more than the sustainable.
This situation is not limited in certain areas, but world-wide situations now.
So, to dig a well is no more a solution to the water problem.
So what do we do?
To build desalination plant run by power of nuclear plants?
[0回]
PR
No.13｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/11（Tue）21:01
Actually are there so many missions to come to do so-called evaluations of projects, and grants are used for those international and local consultants or those independent consultatnts, having retired from international organizations like UN. Indeed, their salary is much higher and eating grant for projects in the developing countries.
Most of grant money can go into the pocket of those international experts and into seminar costs; the most needed can not benefit much, but those officials can get some day-payment to participate in seminars, training, together with some food at not-so-bad hotels.
All in all, without experts, no development;
however, so many paper-works of evaluations are, from some ironical perspectives, labor-costing, paper-cosuming and not to give direct benefits to those in need.
[0回]
No.11｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/05（Wed）22:09
WID is quite an issue and biased in many perspectives.
Those in "need" of WID, in the eye of so-called development experts from the "developed" countries, are really in need?
Not a few women have much more conservative ideas toward their identical cultural values in addition to the mores or the ethical moral or the religious ones.
The notion of WID can be a weapon against the social values, saying that the European and American values are right and correct, though they say, superficially, that traditional social values are duely taken into good consideration.
Do they know Democracy costs too much as a huge burden upon those in the "developing "?
Do those in the "developing" have to adapt themselves to get "humanitarian-willed" or grant-baiting cooperation in order to realize European and Americans' ideas of values at the cost of their identity?
Again, this is a Big Issue like Feminism.
[0回]
No.9｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/05（Wed）21:29
According to Herald Tribune, China, already-wake-up Lion, is facing the dark side of its economic boom. As you may feel, China shows nowadays its weight and influences everywhere especially in the developing countries including Africa.
However, "electricity in China is predominately produced by inefficient, but easy to build, coal-fired power plants that spew greenhouse pollutants into the atmosphere." and "Our Greatest achivement is our biggest burden." according to a Chinese.
"No country in history has emerged as a major industrial power without creating a legacy of environmental damage that can take decades and big dollops of public wealth to undo."
This is just only another Chinese story?
Well, not at all. The pollution in China means the pollutions in the world; this is world-wide situations to influence other countries indeed.
And China's possible economic failure can mean so much because of the Globalization that is, by some, worshipped as Embodied Virtue.
Globalization is, indeed, Dancing Shiva, anyhow.
Could the human control this Dancing Shiva?
[0回]
No.8｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/05（Wed）18:27
Well, most people think that to promote tourism is a good thing for developing countries to get foreign currencies and so duely for national development and creation of jobs, in addition to income increase of peoples.
On the other hand, tourists are very egoistic for their curiosity sake and their quality of life standard.
Even some insist upon that they are promoting "Eco-Tourism", but with Big But, they do not understand the biodiversity nor what about of Eco-Tourism at all; they promot e destruction of Mother Nature which can not be cured by hundreds of years afterwards.
And those lovers of hiking from Europe walk over the virgin nature for their appetite, and they ask too much and they think they are contributing to local people of developing countries by their shoe trekking tours. However, is it so indeed?
Tourism in developing countries is promoted for Money's sake especially for the few upon Capitalism, and Eco-Tourism is not so easy thing to realize.
[0回]
No.5｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/04（Tue）14:31
Without Security, No Development.
Without Development, No Security.
Without Poverty Reduction, No Development.
Without Development, No Poverty Reduction.
Without Roads, Might be No Development.
Without Development, No Roads.
To construct roads mean you destruct Natural Dragon Lines or Leyline or "Blood Streams Of Earth" indeed. Natural Environment is to be destructed much beyond its capacity to regain Nature Power and Balance.[0回]
No.3｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
2007/09/03（Mon）19:51
Well, to support others' development or to develop ourselves are necessary things to do in the first place?
Yes, you may say that these cooperations are for humanitarian reasons or for the fact that you had got supports and gracious grants from the other countries to pay back.
And, do you think this world exists for your lesson and growth even from the spiritual points?
Your life here is School for your Soul?
I will discuss these things in this blog.[0回]
No.1｜Development｜Comment（0）｜Trackback（）
