WID is quite an issue and biased in many perspectives.
Those in "need" of WID, in the eye of so-called development experts from the "developed" countries, are really in need?
Not a few women have much more conservative ideas toward their identical cultural values in addition to the mores or the ethical moral or the religious ones.
The notion of WID can be a weapon against the social values, saying that the European and American values are right and correct, though they say, superficially, that traditional social values are duely taken into good consideration.
Do they know Democracy costs too much as a huge burden upon those in the "developing "?
Do those in the "developing" have to adapt themselves to get "humanitarian-willed" or grant-baiting cooperation in order to realize European and Americans' ideas of values at the cost of their identity?